Every trained model, ranked by how far it beats the benchmark its own market has to clear. Accuracy across different markets is not comparable, because a line that falls one way most of the time hands a model a high score for learning very little. The gap to the benchmark is what ranks here.
| # | Model | Edge | Accuracy | Baseline | Log loss | Sample | Since last train |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tennis games over 23.5 tennis · Totals · Always pick the majority class | +9.28 | 65.08% | 55.80% | 0.6076 | 14,562 | ▲ 0.20 |
| 2 | Tennis games over 21.5 tennis · Totals · Always pick the majority class | +4.57 | 59.78% | 55.21% | 0.6196 | 14,562 | ▲ 0.21 |
| 3 | Tennis games over 19.5 tennis · Totals · Always pick the majority class | +0.75 | 67.31% | 66.56% | 0.5820 | 14,562 | ▼ 0.03 |
Edge is accuracy minus the baseline, in percentage points, measured on the held-out test period each model was evaluated against, never on data it trained on. A model with no recorded baseline shows its accuracy but no edge, because there is nothing to say how much of that accuracy is skill.
| 4 | Tennis winner tennis · Moneyline · Always pick the higher rating | +0.33 | 64.81% | 64.48% | 0.6201 | 14,562 | ▲ 0.10 |